Institutional facade with classical columns
AI Assurance — Public Sector

AI Assurance for public administrations and their suppliers

In the public sector AI is not built — it is procured. The supply chain distributes obligations: the provider delivers technical documentation and CE marking (Art. 16), the integrator signs conformity (Art. 24), and the deploying public administration (Art. 26) carries out the fundamental-rights impact assessment and ongoing monitoring. Bringing conformity to a single platform avoids rebuilding documentation for every tender.

Foto · Joshua Sukoff · Unsplash

What we see in this sector

Scattered inventory of AI systems across departments, with diffuse accountability.

Insufficient traceability for audit — minutes in Word, evidence in emails.

EU AI Act deadlines overlapping with national security framework obligations and automated administrative action duties.

Typical use cases

Applicable regulatory frameworks

Primary frameworks

Cross-cutting frameworks

AI supply chain — your role determines your obligations

The EU AI Act distributes obligations by role (Arts. 16, 24, 26). In this sector each role contributes a different piece to assurance.

Provider (Art. 16)

The provider bidding must deliver technical documentation (Annex IV) and CE marking for any Annex III system.

Integrator (Art. 24)

The integrator (consultancy, JV) is responsible for conformity of the delivered product and assumes Art. 24 obligations.

Deployer (Art. 26)

The deploying public administration (Art. 26) must verify the supplier's CE marking, conduct fundamental-rights impact assessments and monitor the system in production.

One AI Assurance platform — for whichever frameworks apply to you.