Financial district skyscrapers shot from below
AI Assurance — Banking

Triple convergence: EU AI Act, DORA and MiFID II

One assurance platform for the three frameworks at once. The evidence layer is common — redundancy across obligations is removed, not duplicated.

Foto · Maximilian Bruck · Unsplash

What we see in this sector

Internal model evidence for MiFID II rebuilt every audit cycle.

ICT traceability under DORA Art. 28 disconnected from the model lifecycle.

Automated credit scoring decisions under GDPR Art. 22 lacking operational explainability.

Typical use cases

Applicable regulatory frameworks

Primary frameworks

Cross-cutting frameworks

AI supply chain — your role determines your obligations

The EU AI Act distributes obligations by role (Arts. 16, 24, 26). In this sector each role contributes a different piece to assurance.

Provider (Art. 16)

Fintech / scoring / KYC vendors: CE marking and Annex IV dossier mandatory for their banking customers.

Integrator (Art. 24)

Model integrators and consultancies are responsible for package conformity under Art. 24 + DORA Art. 28.

Deployer (Art. 26)

The financial institution must operate the model with human oversight (Art. 14) and keep continuous traceability before the supervisor (ECB, ESMA, national supervisor).

One AI Assurance platform — for whichever frameworks apply to you.